Poker Theorems | Eureka Kid - Poker Player, Sports Fan, Entrepreneur, Libertarian & Blogger

Related Articles

3 users responded in this post

Subscribe to this post comment rss or trackback url
mygif
tiltbad said in October 10th, 2008 at 2:23 pm

I heavily disagree with the clarkmeister theorem and see it as a great great great spot to find a ton of value even with two pair hands vs. some guys.

I have a personal one, cbets work plenty often enough even in multiway pots because everyone is scared of each other and the fact that you’re betting into so many people. additionally, people will play more straight up, so life gets way easier on later streets

mygif
TimTamBiscuit said in October 15th, 2008 at 12:20 pm

In the spirit of Yvesaint Theorem, kinda stupid but:

“Flopped straights never win.”

I don’t know if it has a name but how about “The Crooked Theorem”

In the last two days I’ve had two flopped straights cracked on the river, one by a Royal Flush and the other by Quads.

mygif
SwordfishPoker said in August 23rd, 2009 at 5:12 am

I just stumbled across this old when doing research for an article about poker theorems for my own site.

I think it would be “The Fundamental Theorem of Poker” should be on the list, even though it does stand out a bit when compared to the other theorems. However, I think The Fundamental Theorem of Poker is actually much closer to being a “real” theorem than any of the other poker theorems.

@tiltbad
On the odd chance that you read this, I think it is very bad advice to value bet 2 pair when the river puts a 4-flush on the board. Sure, there are situations where it is a great play, but most players will never ever call with anything worse than 2 pair, so you are just turning your hand into a bluff.

Leave A Reply

 Username (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (*optional)

Please Note: Comment moderation maybe active so there is no need to resubmit your comments